Breaking down the severity of federal conspiracy charges
Conspiracy charges, even on the state level, can have serious penalties. The stakes are significantly increased when conspiracy charges are elevated to a federal level. Whether the charges stem from a purported terrorist attack or from a drug-related criminal conspiracy, these accusations can put an Oregon resident in an uncompromising position.
By definition, conspiracy refers to an unlawful agreement between two or more parties to commit a crime and it is immaterial if the crime was successfully accomplished. An accused person will not receive a lesser charge if the crime was unsuccessful; this shows just how severe these kinds of charges are. This is because conspiracy is viewed as an opportunity to increase the likelihood of the crime and its effects. It also adds to the likelihood that other crimes may be committed to further the cause of the criminal enterprise.
An Oregon resident facing conspiracy charges should understand that a focal point of the charges is to prove that at least one member is guilty of the crime. Federal prosecutors often use the exception to the "hearsay" rule of evidence to stress the guilt of an accused. "Hearsay" refers to a statement that was used by a person testifying to prove the accusations. This can come from an informant, an undercover agent or even a defendant who has decided to cooperate with prosecutors.
In any situation, federal conspiracy charges are very complex. An Oregon resident facing such charges can also be accused of other charges, even if that person is unaware of the crime or an unwilling accessory. An accused person, however, can challenge the allegations with an aggressive and strategic criminal defense strategy. The defense should carefully scrutinize evidence and assess witness testimony. The criminal defense should also determine if there were lapses in the investigation process and if the rights of the accused were violated in any way.